The Marian community has been an ideal place for Nick to grow into his purpose and be part of helping others grow into theirs.
_______________________
Saturday, March 25, 2023
Share the Vision: A School Choice Testimony
Saturday, February 18, 2023
Why I Had a Mass Offered for Janis Joplin
“It is therefore a holy and wholesome thought to pray for the dead,that they may be loosed from sins” (2 Mc 12.46).
__________________________
One Meal a Day: Not Just for Monks Anymore
“Fasting is the helm of human life and governs the whole ship of our body.”
__________________________
Wednesday, February 15, 2023
Jim Eder (1940-2023): Conjurer of Community
“Heaven is a banquet and life is a banquet, too, even with a crust,
where there is companionship.”
__________________________
Sunday, July 10, 2022
Father Stu: The Language of Love
“To boast in the Cross is an almost fierce gesture
when we confront all that would defeat us.”
_______________________________
Monday, January 24, 2022
Ignoring Women's Health? A Pro-Life Response
The other day, I posted a short piece by Patrick Kelly from the Knights of Columbus that appeared in the Wall Street Journal. The piece was timed to coincide with weekend Roe v. Wade commemorations, and it celebrated the magnificent contributions pregnancy resource centers have made toward promoting life and supporting pregnant women over the years – a compassionate, charitable work that predates the 1973 Supreme Court decision.
In my public post, I included the following pull-quote from Kelly's article regarding the centers:
The Guttmacher Institute...complains they are “typically staffed by volunteers and employees who lack medical training and licensure.” It’s a strange criticism from those for whom a “successful” medical procedure always ends in the death of a human being.
In response, a friend of mine made this (public) comment:
Of course, WSJ ignores the health of the women with that crack. I guess for them being pro life really does stop at birth - at which point they are pro chaos.
Here's what I wrote in reply.
_____________________
To begin with, the article is by Patrick Kelly from the Knights of Columbus, not the WSJ editorial board. That's important because the K of C are directly and extensively involved in supporting and underwriting the good efforts of crisis pregnancy centers across the country (and around the world, I think). I'm a proud member of the Knights and happy to be associated with their charitable efforts.
Second, and more importantly, if you actually spoke with anyone who was thoroughly pro-life or familiarized yourself with their work, you'd know that it's frankly silly to accuse them of ignoring women's health. "The people who work at these centers serve the whole person—medically, financially, emotionally and spiritually," Kelly writes in his piece. "That’s something no abortion clinic can do, and it helps explain why their numbers are dwindling while the number of pregnancy resource centers grows." By working tirelessly to provide pregnant moms with what they need to continue their pregnancies and care for their babies after delivery, crisis pregnancy centers are most definitely committed to maternal health as well as defending preborn life.
Still, I'm willing to grant you the benefit of the doubt, and I'm guessing your comment is related to the myth that abortion is sometimes required to preserve a woman's health. That's a false notion that's rooted in a shortsighted ethical perspective. Consider this statement from the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists:
When extreme medical emergencies that threaten the life of the mother arise..., AAPLOG believes in "treatment to save the mother’s life," including premature delivery if that is indicated — obviously with the patient’s informed consent. This is NOT "abortion to save the mother’s life." We are treating two patients, the mother and the baby, and every reasonable attempt to save the baby’s life would also be a part of our medical intervention. We acknowledge that, in some such instances, the baby would be too premature to survive.Anyway, maybe that sounds like so much sophistry and ethical mumbo-jumbo, but you can hardly accuse those who embrace that stance of "ignoring" women's health. Pro-life people are just that: Pro-life. The baby's life. The mom's life. The life of the elderly, the infirm, the brain-injured. The poor, the marginalized, the incarcerated, the immigrant. "I have set before you life and death," God tells the Israelites, "therefore choose life" (Deut. 30.19). It's a command that pro-life folks (like me) try to embody and promote every day. Sometimes we do it well; sometimes not. Even so, we're always striving to foster a world in which killing is never required to solve problems. Never.
So, please talk to some pro-life people. Hell, talk to me. I'll be happy to tell you how I see all this stuff. But, please, friend, don't accuse me and those who think like me of ignoring women's health just because we are opposed to killing babies in the womb. That's just foolishness.
____________________
____________________
Sunday, October 10, 2021
A Message to My Goddaughter on the Occasion of Her Confirmation
To war! To war! Once more into the breach!
I stand behind you, Mary, as you now take up arms in the battle for God's glory – you are a warrior now, grown to full sacramental stature and equipped to lay waste all that stands in the way of God's reign.
Courage!
Honor!
No compromise – victory alone!
I will continue to pray for you daily as you launch into the company of warriors already engaged in this struggle. I'm proud to have stood by you at the start.
_________________________________
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)